braun: BKS 237 - BSK 237; Koffer-Super

 

Dear administrators-editors,

In this post I posted photo BKS237 model with a range of wavelengths MW and LW. Why are you posted pictures BKS237K receiver with a range of LW, MW and KW? Besides. there are differences in the design of radio boxes:

BKS237 - back panel is not removable

BKS237K - removable rearpanel

Various sizes of box:

 

BKS237 - 350x260x150 mm

BKS237K - 400x300x190 mm

Different connection to battery:

 

BKS237 - spring terminals

BKS237K - another way to connect

This data is sufficient to present a model Braun BKS237 as a new model for RMorg.

Kind regards,

Korniienko Oleksii.

 

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.

I think all the BKS237K with SW are from Valery Gromov

What is difference with the Koffer-Super BKS237 F - BSK237 F that has KW?

Anyway, I moved all the photos Valery uploaded to the Koffer-Super BKS237K no doubt he loaded them to the wrong model by mistake as the filenames have the "K"

Cases like this you can use the admin-en address at radiomuseum.org

 

Thanks.

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.

What is difference with the Koffer-Super BKS237 F - BSK237 F that has KW?

Dear Michael Watterson

The answer to your question with his coments:

1). The list shows the status of the cap lamp KC1_4pin with no photo real model, and the base schema

type can not be determined.

2). In the look, Lange-Nowisch, Band 2 preserved "Berichtigung," which shows that "Braun237F" in

nature does not exist. So, administrators need to decide for themselves.

Kind regards

Oleksii Korniienko.

 

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.

That suffix "F" was obviously a typo in the first edition of Lange-Nowisch, which was corrected in the second printing (4th ot 8th thousand) to read "K".

Der Zusatz "F" ist ein Druckfehler in der Erstausgabe. Die folgende Auflage (4. bis 8.Tausend) ist bereits korrigiert auf "K":

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.

Dear Michael Watterson From this a typo in the post RMorg "Koffer Super BKS237F-FBSK237" appeared non-existent model, where the fivst scheme BSK237F-typo, and the second scheme BKS237-real model presented me to another post. Conclusion: The post"Koffer Super BKS237F-FBSK237" should be removed completely. Kind regards Oleksii Korniienko.

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.

 

Dear Oleksii,

if there is a typo found in literature or at hardware, we keep that as a model with appropriate remark.

Why?  If we would not, then sometimes in future somebody would find it and (not knowing of being a typo) would propose it as a new model. And the poor admins would have to start again research and explanations or might even overlook.

That is undesirable. Since we are not only a listing of existing models, but an encyclopedia, we must also inform about such errors.

The"phantom" must be kept. OK?

KoBi

To thank the Author because you find the post helpful or well done.