5R12 Ch = 5 R 1
Admiral (brand) Continental Radio & Television Co.; Chicago, IL
- Country
- United States of America (USA)
- Manufacturer / Brand
- Admiral (brand) Continental Radio & Television Co.; Chicago, IL
- Year
- 1949 ??
- Category
- Broadcast Receiver - or past WW2 Tuner
- Radiomuseum.org ID
- 93215
-
- alternative name: Continental Radio & TV
Click on the schematic thumbnail to request the schematic as a free document.
- Number of Tubes
- 5
- Main principle
- Superheterodyne (common); ZF/IF 455 kHz; 2 AF stage(s)
- Tuned circuits
- 6 AM circuit(s)
- Wave bands
- Broadcast only (MW).
- Power type and voltage
- AC/DC-set / 117 Volt
- Loudspeaker
- Permanent Magnet Dynamic (PDyn) Loudspeaker (moving coil) / Ø 5 inch = 12.7 cm
- Material
- Bakelite or Plastics (type unknown)
- from Radiomuseum.org
- Model: 5R12 Ch = 5 R 1 - Admiral brand Continental
- Shape
- Tablemodel without push buttons, Mantel/Midget/Compact up to 14
- Dimensions (WHD)
- 10.5 x 6.5 x 6 inch / 267 x 165 x 152 mm
- Notes
- Built in loop antenna. An identical set with the same model number was produced by Canadian Admiral Corp. for sale in Canada. Hence service sheets published by both Riders & Radio College of Canada.
- Net weight (2.2 lb = 1 kg)
- 2.2 kg / 4 lb 13.5 oz (4.846 lb)
- Circuit diagram reference
- Rider's Perpetual, Volume 22, covering 1951
- Literature/Schematics (1)
- Radio College of Canada, Individual Circuit Service, 1927-1953
- Author
- Model page created by Vitor Oliveira. See "Data change" for further contributors.
- Other Models
-
Here you find 3211 models, 1322 with images and 2578 with schematics for wireless sets etc. In French: TSF for Télégraphie sans fil.
All listed radios etc. from Admiral (brand) Continental Radio & Television Co.; Chicago, IL
Forum contributions about this model: Admiral brand: 5R12 Ch = 5 R 1
Threads: 1 | Posts: 1
The photo of the top of the chassis of the Admiral 5R12 and 5R13 is of some other chassis. The tubes shown in the photo are not the tubes used in those models. The other pictures are correct.
Lynn Hatfield, 06.Aug.11