• Year
  • 1932
  • Category
  • Broadcast Receiver - or past WW2 Tuner
  • Radiomuseum.org ID
  • 34132

Click on the schematic thumbnail to request the schematic as a free document.

 Technical Specifications

  • Number of Tubes
  • 5
  • Main principle
  • Superheterodyne (common); 1 AF stage(s)
  • Tuned circuits
  • 6 AM circuit(s)
  • Wave bands
  • Broadcast only (MW).
  • Power type and voltage
  • Alternating Current supply (AC) / 110 Volt
  • Loudspeaker
  • Permanent or electro-dynamic (moving coil), system not known yet.
  • Material
  • Wooden case
  • from Radiomuseum.org
  • Model: 51C Ch= Series 50C - Belmont Radio Corp. B.R.C.;
  • Shape
  • Table-Cathedral-Type (upright, round top or gothic arch, not rounded edges only).
  • Notes
  • Line frequency = 60 Hz. See the forum text for same cabinet for different currents. See also the same chassis in Ozarka Pioneer 56 with a very similar cabinet and in Console Pioneer 56.

  • Price in first year of sale
  • 27.00 $
  • External source of data
  • Ernst Erb
  • Circuit diagram reference
  • Rider's Perpetual, Volume 3 = 1933 and before

 Collections | Museums | Literature

 Forum

Forum contributions about this model: Belmont Radio Corp.: 51C Ch= Series 50C

Threads: 1 | Posts: 1

The schemaitc for Series 50C is for the four different models 51C (110 V, 60 cycles), 52C (110/25), 53C (220/60) and 54C (220/25). These models distinguish from each other only by the volts and frequency of the current.

Member Donald Patterson has told me the following: 

Lets start with Matheson Bells Letter.  He was out of Ozarka in 1932.  Before his bankruptcy he introduced the Pioneer Model 56 (see attachment).
I purchased the set and all of the components of this set matched the schematic for a Belmont  Series 50C(attached).  The grill is a little different from the photo of the ad (attached) but the components and escutcheon match.  Back plate says BRC on the label. So Belmont provided one chassis for Ozarka period.  This same chassis was also sold to the Brand Skyrover which I also had at one time but it was not Ozarka.

Ernst Erb, 07.Dec.13

Weitere Posts (1) zu diesem Thema.