Noch ein export modell?
Noch ein export modell?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/996b1/996b1929c92ddf2955b85a07f4234ebf2078800c" alt="Peter Hughes"
Kaiser TYPW 1156/3D. Ist dieses Radio in Deutschland bekannt?
Peter
Anlagen:- Kaiser TYPW 1156/3D (24 KB)
Für diesen Post bedanken, weil hilfreich und/oder fachlich fundiert.
Kaiser W1156/3D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9d51/d9d516a7c11a8738e7b657146ef02f85233f2cf2" alt="Bernhard Nagel"
Hallo Peter,
dieses interessante Export-Modell ist im RMorg nicht bekannt. Ebay #290233866055 ist die zugehörige Auktion.
Vom Gehäuse entspricht es genau Kaiserwalzer W1145/3D , die Skala und die Tastatur erinnert deutlich an das Modell Contest DX1151 (Anzahl Bereiche, Tasten..). Wir können also von einem speziellen Kurzwellen-Gerät ausgehen, was um 1955/56 gebaut wurde.
Es sollte unbedingt angelegt werden.
Bernhard
Für diesen Post bedanken, weil hilfreich und/oder fachlich fundiert.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/996b1/996b1929c92ddf2955b85a07f4234ebf2078800c" alt="Peter Hughes"
But sadly my suggestion of this model was rejected.
:-(
Für diesen Post bedanken, weil hilfreich und/oder fachlich fundiert.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22ebe/22ebea8fbfedbc9252d1a1fdc897f53c8ecc84bf" alt="Wolfgang Bauer"
Hallo Peter,
Sorry, Mr. Bernhard Nagel make it first.
Your nomination was a doublet.
You will find the model here ==> Kaiser W1156/3D
Best regards WB.
Für diesen Post bedanken, weil hilfreich und/oder fachlich fundiert.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994b5/994b5c4269eb2cf2e4d68fcdcc69565bfa5d3a37" alt="Arpad Roth † 27.3.17"
See post 5.
Für diesen Post bedanken, weil hilfreich und/oder fachlich fundiert.
Rejection
The model admins reject or should reject only with good reasons given.
Can you please tell me the reasons named when you received the automatic eMail?
Most often it is an already existing model or very insufficient data, no given reasons for the model.
If a model is similar to one existing in the database then one has to give good reasons why the new model should be accepted. The same thing if a model is very incomplete.
Sometimes one can only give maker, model-name and maybe year. But then it is well done to give the source (there are fields for that).
I don't know what was the reasons but I would like to clear that case. Please help me. Thank you.
Cordially,
Ernest
Für diesen Post bedanken, weil hilfreich und/oder fachlich fundiert.
Yes, ready to load up pictures ...
I gave you a general answer before I could see post 5 and 6 (I had my post too long in the editor because of other work in between).
I know now the case by now:
I'm sorry that the message from Bernhard Nagel suggested that you (or somebody) should create the model - and Bernhard Nagel then created it himself without telling that he has done so. We can now learn on this case how important crystal clear signals are and how important the following up is in a thread, telling what is the last state of an action or so - often only a "thank you".
On the other hand one can see now why, from the beginning on, I constructed the site with having foreseen two admins to check - and we see that they do the job well. This as a positive sign.
It is always very necessary t look up if a model does really not exist - and there is still the possibility that it is already pending within the link "Administrators" - but a very seldom case.
Now I'm looking forward to your pictures and hope you are not too dissatisfied about this. Admins have told me that the reason was given.
By the way:
On an export model it would be much better to have the notes in English - even more important than in German. Since made in Germany German can ALSO be admitted.
Für diesen Post bedanken, weil hilfreich und/oder fachlich fundiert.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/996b1/996b1929c92ddf2955b85a07f4234ebf2078800c" alt="Peter Hughes"
Hello Ernst
Yes, no worries. I see now what has happened, thank you.
I did not initially understand the term used to explain the reason.
My mistake!
Peter
Für diesen Post bedanken, weil hilfreich und/oder fachlich fundiert.