• Année
  • 1935
  • Catégorie
  • Radio - ou tuner d'après la guerre 1939-45
  • Radiomuseum.org ID
  • 100255

 Spécifications techniques

  • No. de tubes
  • 6
  • Principe général
  • Super hétérodyne (en général); FI/IF 264 kHz; 2 Etage(s) BF
  • Gammes d'ondes
  • PO et OC
  • Tension / type courant
  • Alimentation Courant Alternatif (CA) / 110 Volt
  • Haut-parleur
  • HP dynamique à électro-aimant (électrodynamique) / Ø 7 inch = 17.8 cm
  • Matière
  • Boitier en bois
  • De Radiomuseum.org
  • Modèle: 456 - Atwater Kent Mfg. Co.;
  • Forme
  • Modèle de table vertical décoré (pierre tombale)
  • Dimensions (LHP)
  • 14 x 18 x 8.5 inch / 356 x 457 x 216 mm
  • Poids net
  • 12.5 kg / 27 lb 8.5 oz (27.533 lb)
  • Source du schéma
  • Rider's Perpetual, Volume 6 = 1935 and before
  • Littérature
  • - - Data from my own collection

 Collections | Musées | Littérature

Collections

Le modèle 456 fait partie des collections des membres suivants.

 Forum

Contributions du forum pour ce modèle: Atwater Kent Mfg. Co: 456

Discussions: 1 | Publications: 1

The photos presented by Ignacio Rodriguez-Rodriguez show the correct cabinet for a model 456, however, the chassis photos are not correct for that model.  I have not been  able to identify the chassis in the photo as of yet.  I believe that the chassis has been significantly modified from the factory build. The big difference is that this photo shows a 2 section tuning condenser, wheras, the models which I have that utilize this dial / knob arrangement all utilize a 3 section tuning condenser.  this knob arrangement was used on 1935 and 1936 sets with 6 and 7 tube complement.  There were very few sets that matched the knob arrangement with a 5 tube complement, but the ones I have still use the 3 section condenser, such as the model 735.  (Note; the last digit of the Atwater Kent model number represents the quantity of tubes used) It's not likely that someone would change out a 3 section condenser circuit to a 2 section condenser circuit.  Although I haven't been able to identify the chassis photographed by Ignacio, I'm positive that it's not the model 456 chassis.  Also, compare the two chassis in the model 456 page, the other chassis is correct.  I would like to know what model that Ignacio's photo is of so I could put it into my Atwater Kent notes.  I will entertain any discussion on the photo in the model.  Regards, Dennis Craft

Dennis Craft, 14.Jul.20

Weitere Posts (1) zu diesem Thema.