Capehart Turn-over Record Changer 41-E
Farnsworth Television & Radio Corp. - see also Capehart
- Pays
- Etats-Unis
- Fabricant / Marque
- Farnsworth Television & Radio Corp. - see also Capehart
- Année
- 1945–1949
- Catégorie
- Enrégistreur et/ou reproducteur son/video
- Radiomuseum.org ID
- 40040
Cliquez sur la vignette du schéma pour le demander en tant que document gratuit.
- Gammes d'ondes
- - sans
- Particularités
- Tourne disque changeur double face
- Tension / type courant
- Alimentation Courant Alternatif (CA) / 117 Volt
- Haut-parleur
- - Pour casque ou amplificateur BF
- Matière
- Boitier métallique
- De Radiomuseum.org
- Modèle: Capehart Turn-over Record Changer 41-E - Farnsworth Television & Radio
- Forme
- Chassis (pour intégration dans meuble)
- Remarques
-
Capehart 41-E is the turning changer only from after the war.
See here the "Common information for the Capehart model pages for the 1930s and 1940s".
- Source extérieure
- Ernst Erb
- Source du schéma
- Rider's Perpetual, Volume 20 covering 1950
- D'autres Modèles
-
Vous pourrez trouver sous ce lien 400 modèles d'appareils, 284 avec des images et 327 avec des schémas.
Tous les appareils de Farnsworth Television & Radio Corp. - see also Capehart
Contributions du forum pour ce modèle: Farnsworth: Capehart Turn-over Record Changer 41-E
Discussions: 1 | Publications: 1
We received the following comment from Robert Mersey (guest);
Just a note to say that you have your information wrong on the 1948 ,
1949 Capehart 41-E changers,,, they didn't use crystal pick-ups, they
used GE magnetic cartridges on all 41-E units..
Bob
I asked him to provide more detail and received the following response:
Hi Dave, one place I found that information is in Bob Baumbachs' book where he has a "Capehart Hardware Chart", (sorry no page number). At the bottom of the page where it shows the 1946-1947 on 1949 41-E changers. It states that the curved arm changers used Crystal pick-ups. Also, Ernst Erb had a page from somewhere, maybe "Riders", where he copied the chart .That is where I originally found the incorrect info.
regards, Bob
David Erali, 27.Aug.18