Unknown

Grammont (Radiofotos, Fotos); Paris, Malakoff

Data
Forum
Pictures
Collections

  • Year
  • 1933 ?
  • Category
  • Broadcast Receiver - or past WW2 Tuner
  • Radiomuseum.org ID
  • 131154
    • alternative name: Radiofotos || Société des lampes Fotos

 Technical Specifications

  • Number of Tubes
  • 7
  • Main principle
  • Superhet with RF-stage; 2 AF stage(s)
  • Tuned circuits
  • 7 AM circuit(s)
  • Wave bands
  • Broadcast (MW) and Long Wave.
  • Details
  • Record Player (not changer)
  • Power type and voltage
  • Alternating Current supply (AC) / 110-240 Volt
  • Loudspeaker
  • Electro Magnetic Dynamic LS (moving-coil with field excitation coil) / Ø 8.7 inch = 22.1 cm
  • Material
  • Wooden case
  • from Radiomuseum.org
  • Model: Unknown - Grammont Radiofotos, Fotos;
  • Shape
  • Tablemodel, high profile (upright - NOT Cathedral nor decorative).
  • Dimensions (WHD)
  • 17 x 26.5 x 13.5 inch / 432 x 673 x 343 mm
  • Notes
  • This unknown Radio + Phonograph is similar to 2030 Super or 2803.
  • Source of data
  • - - Data from my own collection
  • Author
  • Model page created by Dave McClellan. See "Data change" for further contributors.

 Collections | Museums | Literature

Collections

The model Unknown is part of the collections of the following members.

 Forum

Forum contributions about this model: Grammont Radiofotos,: Unknown

Threads: 1 | Posts: 9

I have a Grammont radio+phonograph.  It is almost identical in appearance to the Grammont Super 2030 shown in RM, except that it is taller and has a door and pull-out shelf with a 78 RPM phonograph on the bottom.  The circuit for my radio is that shown in RM for the schematic for Grammont model 2837, except that mine has an additional bandswitch position for the phonograph (PU) .  My radio does not have a back cover and thus the model number is unknown.  I assume it dates from circa 1933, like the Super 2030. 

Both the radio and phono are capable of operation on 120-240 volts and 50-60 hertz.  I did restore my radio and it works very well indeed.

Thanks

Dave McClellan, 19.May.08

Weitere Posts (9) zu diesem Thema.